[case_victory_auto_title]

Child Custody Case Victory in Maricopa County, October 2026

October 27, 2026
Case Victories Family Law

CASE SUMMARY:

Court Sets Aside Child Support Judgments After Finding Fraud Upon the Court
Case Type:
Case Type Detail: Child Custody
Anonymized Case Name: C.M v. R.L.
Party Represented by TVLG: R.L.
Client’s Role in the Litigation: Father
Court: Maricopa County
Date Resolved: October 27, 2026
The Valley Law Group

Outcome:

The Court granted Father’s Motion to Set Aside the current child support order and found that Mother had committed fraud upon the Court. As a result, a 2023 Order for Child Support and the later judgments were set aside under Rule 85(d)(3) of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure. This resulted in well over $100,000 in judgment reversals for Father. The motion challenged child support orders that were based on a large overstatement of his income.

Background & Key Facts:

Fraud upon the court is a demanding standard. Arizona courts describe it as “the most egregious conduct involving a corruption of the judicial process itself.” Under Alvarado v. Thomson, 240 Ariz. 12 (2016), a court may set aside a judgment when a party obtained it by hiding material facts and suppressing the truth with the intent to mislead the court. Equity allows this remedy because, as the Court noted, “fraud is the arch enemy of equity.” The evidence met that standard. The Court found that Mother: Filed fraudulent tax returns in Father’s name to increase the child support amount. Pretended to be Father, using an email address in his name to send the tax records to the Court’s division. This led the Court to reopen evidence and set a continued evidentiary hearing. Kept the fraud going through later post-judgment motions and petitions. Essentially, because of Mother’s fraud, the Court relied on the false evidence and testimony when it entered original child support orders against Father in 2023.

CASE / Strategy:

Father’s team saw that ordinary claims of fraud or newly discovered evidence under Rule 85(b)(2) and (b)(3) were time-barred, so they built the motion around fraud upon the court under Rule 85(d)(3), which has no fixed deadline, and added Rules 85(a), (b)(6), and (d)(1) as backup grounds. At the same time, they asked the Court to pause enforcement and modification of the existing support order so it couldn’t be acted on while the motion was pending. At the evidentiary hearing, they showed that Mother fabricated Father’s tax return and pretended to be him by email to get it into evidence, that the Court relied on the resulting income figure, and that she kept the fraud going in later filings.

Client Impact:

The ruling shows that Arizona family courts will step in to correct a judgment when the judicial process itself has been corrupted. It also shows the value of looking closely at the financial evidence behind a support order. Father has now been relieved of child support obligations that were based on a fabricated income figure. He can move forward with orders grounded in the truth.

Why This Win Matters:

As a result of these orders, Father is no longer obligated to pay the more than $3,000 per month in child support previously awarded to Mother. In addition, prior judgments against him for child support arrearages and attorney’s fees totaling more than $100,000 were vacated.

Our team is here to protect your rights and pursue the strongest possible outcome.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

Get Free Consultation

Our Phoenix Office Has Moved

Beginning August 17, 2026, please visit us at:

3550 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, AZ 85012