[case_victory_auto_title]

Home » Case Victories » Enforcement of Orders Case Victory in Maricopa Superior Court, August 2026

Enforcement of Orders Case Victory in Maricopa Superior Court, August 2026

August 1, 2026

Family Law

CASE SUMMARY:

Rule 69 Enforcement of Oral Agreements on the Court record with a written proposed order.

Case Type: Family Law

Case Type Detail: Enforcement of Orders

Anonymized Case Name: A.W. v. V.F.

Party Represented by TVLG: A.W.

Client’s Role in the Litigation: Petitioner

Court: Maricopa Superior Court

Date Resolved: August 1, 2026

Outcome:

Respondent was awarded the marital property in the dissolution. After several years, Respondent failed to refinance or otherwise remove financial responsibility from Petitioner. The marital property was almost foreclosed upon due to failure of Respondent to make timely payments. Petitioner offered to take over the home which was accepted by Respondent. However, Respondent later objected to orders lodged with the court and refused to cooperate with the transfer of the property. The Court set an evidentiary hearing regarding the proposed lodged order by Petitioner and Respondent. Petitioner was able to demonstrate Petitioner’s order was sufficient and appropriate to be adopted by the Court.

Background & Key Facts:

Despite Respondent’s agreement Petitioner could be awarded the marital residence, Respondent took actions to purposefully inhibit Petitioner’s ability to remove Respondent from the title and loan. Respondent dragged out proceedings due to Respondent’s refusal to sign necessary deeds and other paperwork to effectuate the transfer of the property.

CASE / Strategy:

We focused on the wording of the actual agreement the parties entered into, as well as Respondent’s actions to act as a barrier and the actions taken by Petitioner to proceed in good faith. This was a limited matter which was very important to Petitioner.

Client Impact:

Petitioner was able to proceed with plans to keep the marital residence. Petitioner was elated Petitioner would not have to move from the residence or sell the home.

Why This Win Matters:

Petitioner avoided the unwanted sale of the marital residence. Petitioner now has the option to move forward with removal of Respondent from the loan and home documents. This matter was pending for over a year by the time TVLG was involved. we were able to bring conclusion to the lengthy litigation.

Our team is here to protect your rights and pursue the strongest possible outcome.

Contact us today for a free consultation.